|
The philosopher is a knight in search of his Holy Grail. All dark
fortresses he encounters along the way he assails with his sharp
sword of discernment. He looks for any weakness in their defences
and brings the walls tumbling down. Any barriers that would hold
him and others back, blocking the way to his goal, he topples.
And if a castle of any kind, of the passive, the indulgent or the
barbarous, can be brought to ruin he does so; in this he is ruthless.
For better that he should expose the faults than allow delusion
to continue. He will not allow any to abide within the blind walls
of ignorance nor under the roof of false security.
Any opponent he comes across on the path he challenges: if he wins
he continues on; if his fight is well met and matched he respects
his fellow knight and honours his views; and if his fight is met,
matched and overcome in all fairness under the code of chivalry,
having expended his greatest efforts he humbly kneels and bows to
this supreme knight and opens his heart to a wisdom greater than
his own.
He knows that all knights are on the same quest and that all their
challenges serve to lead them on. But a time will come when the
might and sharpness of his weapons will avail him no more, they
will serve then only to weigh him down and prevent him from reaching
his goal. A time will come when he must lay down his arms and surrender
to Truth.
The True Philosophy is nothing new but that which has always been
and will continue to be. Whether it is known or unknown, acknowledged
or scorned, makes no difference to it, it still holds strong.
The false philosophy, on the other hand, must fall, as an ill-designed
tower block must fall, pulling down with it those that swear by
it to the end. But watch for the signs - the inconsistencies and
faulty links, the growing cracks and unstable foundations. These
are the marks of error.
The philosopher of the True Philosophy admits the inadequacy of
his words, the contradictions that arise when attempting to define
it. Plato wrote, There is no way of putting it in words like
other studies, and yet still he wrote.
The True Philosophy is beyond words, perfect Truth. Only in its
expression is there room for improvement and refinement of details,
and this is the task passed on to the student, to bring the imperfect
closer to perfection. Expressive and descriptive philosophy can
only point the way and praise the ineffable beauty of the True Philosophy
ever beyond the grasp of the senses.
It really makes no difference whether the philosopher is rich or
poor. What matters most is inner wealth and well-being. If he receives
a rich windfall but has not inner wealth it will avail him none.
Whereas even if he suffers great ruinous material loss and yet has
inner wealth, it does him no deep injury.
But inner wealth is not something one acquires. It is always there,
waiting to be acknowledged; the hidden store in every being; the
forgotten reserves buried under the weight of material possessions;
the priceless antique undervalued and overlooked, locked away in
an abandoned recess.
Inner wealth is the rich papyrus rediscovered after millennia hidden
discreetly in some dark niche. To those who recognise its true worth
it is great and beautiful beyond all compare. Those who would only
scribble on the back of it, ignorant of what they do, are themselves
in the dark as to where wealth and happiness truly lie.
Happiness is in the heart. It is not dependent on externals. True,
some externals evoke happiness; some others do not; but always happiness
is in the heart. Lasting contentment and satisfaction is not to
be found in external ephemera; only when its secret hiding place
is discovered will the lure of desire be truly quenched. Till then,
inner wealth is unwittingly traded for meagre somethings.
Follow the sweet track of goodness, goodness for goodness
sake. Goodness is an expression of your true nature: what is good
is right, what is right is true. Truth is the Good.
Right is right and wrong is wrong. Goodness is deemed good simply
because it tends towards Truth and the Real. Badness is that which
goes against the Real, and to do evil is to wrong ones own
true self and to wear a pretence.
Goodness leads to Truth; badness leads to lies and deceit. But
do not be good because you are told to, or commanded to, or because
of the ill-fortune that will befall you elsewise. Be good simply
because you are. As the Indian sage Ramana Maharshi said, Be
as you are.
Does the migrating swift, passing over fields and farms, forests
and cities, country borders and the countless fences man puts up
between himself and his brothers, look down and see separate lands
and lands within lands owned by separate people? No, all he sees
is the great expanse out and over the horizon.
How foolish it is to claim ownership of anything, let alone the
land. Even the humble pen with which I often write is not mine.
If it were to be stolen would it then belong to the thief? Surely
not. Only if it is given as a gift, purchased, or maybe won somehow
may it then rightly belong to another. But were not the elements
which make up the pen taken from the land?
Possession is the hoarders delusion. Nothing is or ever can
be owned by anyone; ownership does not exist. My writing pen, as
I call it, is a portion of the All in my care, an object trusted
to me to use wisely. I never gained it, nor will I ever lose it
though it slips from my hand.
And the borders and fences that limit our countries and gardens
are acceptable only if they protect the lands in our care and allow
them to grow towards Beauty. Although eventually all walls must
fall. Untruths cannot last, and professed ownership is doomed to
be overthrown. Let the wise man cling to nothing uncertain or transient,
lest he should fall with it.
The ego is an elusive phantom, a thief in the night. Try to catch
him by torchlight and he quickly slips away. For he is a thing of
shadows and cannot stand in the glare of Truth.
No discrete entities exist; any separation in the Whole being an
illusion. Therefore the ego can only be present as a vague misconception.
And whereas the aim of the ascetic may be to extinguish the ego,
this will not be accomplished - what does not exist cannot die.
True annihilation of the ego is the uprooting of the conviction
of it ever existing.
But yes, the selfishness of the ego may be seen as opposing the
selfless nature of God and all that is godlike, where God stands
for the right, the real, and the true Will. For the part is error
and the Whole is Truth. The True Self is No-self.
There is nothing the philosopher can know which is not already
known, and he cannot expect to express a truth that is not already
or has not been previously expressed. The greatest truths are demonstrated
everywhere. All the philosopher does is translate them, or point
them out.
The philosopher knows that truths are evident all about him. His
aim is to perceive them more clearly and to present them to his
fellows in a more accessible manner, always seeking greater accuracy
and simplicity. Yet it makes no difference to him whether his fellows
deride, ignore or acknowledge; truth is with them whatever, and
they will only realise it when they are ready. He neither craves
admiration nor fears disparagement.
And it matters not to the philosopher whether he remains silent,
speaks a truth or tells a joke. Whatever, whenever and wherever,
Truth is present and truths are displayed. This is the philosophers
humility, that although he cannot express the Great Truth, it is
nonetheless present in all he does.
The man who is dominated by the base instincts is like a man who
takes his dog out on a lead, only to be dragged here and there by
the wild hound.
The man who is struggling to master the base instincts is like
a man who takes his dog out on a lead, but, even though the hound
may tug ceaselessly, he keeps him close to the clear path.
But the man who is master of his own has no such problems. He is
like a man whose dog walks with him over the field and through the
wood, an obedient dog who needs no lead, a strong dog but one who
can run and play harmlessly, a friendly companion and a noble guard.
He does not subjugate forcefully his base instincts, but leaves
them in their proper place. For in man intelligence has risen and
must needs be the guide.
The Independent Philosopher clings to no creed, holds no theory
as without fault, adheres to no transient doctrine. Theories are
to him only tools pointing towards ineffable Truth: they may prove
useful in his everyday life, but must eventually be cast aside when
he enters the Infinite. The walking-sticks of life are not for those
who have freed their wings.
The Independent Philosopher is a student of life and all that life
contains. Therefore he does not limit himself to any particular
science or religion, for to do so would prevent him from seeing
the whole picture. And Truth is a whole.
His studies encounter and encompass all sciences and all lifes
religions, past and present. Although he is open and receptive,
he is also discerning and is not taken in by spurious beliefs. Truth
is his guide. Truth is his goal. He may rest upon a theory a while,
exploring its possibilities, but is never held back from his search.
Not until Truth, in all its omnipresent simplicity, is realised
will he arrive at his goal.
Meditation is the practice of sitting in silence, letting go of
thoughts and letting thoughts go. Relaxing the body in a comfortable
but firm position allows the mind also to relax, although it may
at first, out of habit, take the opportunity to think of the sundry
things previously put on hold when the body was too busy to consider
them.
Concentration keeps the mind single-minded. When the meditator
becomes aware that he is drifting along with idle thoughts he returns
his attention softly to himself and continues concentration. There
is a fine line to seek where concentration is effortless, where
the mind is not lax but alert, and not active but attentive.
Aiming for this, concentrating on a point, sharpens the mind; and
when the mind is finely honed it may more easily pierce the object
of contemplation, so gaining greater insight. The mind is the philosophers
sharpened tool which he needs must polish and perfect.
If a philosophers mind is full of uncontrollable thoughts
he is like a charioteer who has let go the reins, a helpless passenger
to whim and circumstance. He must take charge of his life and regain
his rightful position as master of his own thoughts. Meditation
is the pathway to this, the walking-stick that must one day, like
all things and theories, be thrown aside.
If one has truly experienced autumn, one has experienced the autumn
in all things. Therefore, it is not necessary to encounter all possible
situations to garner wisdom. If one could fully experience the present
situation, here and now, whether cruel or harmonious, one would
attain wisdom.
The philosopher, then, should be fully present at all times, like
a patient astronomer who watches the night sky waiting for the clouds
to pass that he may glimpse the object of his observations. For
there are moments when the light of wisdom flickers through the
haze and can be discerned more easily.
If one has truly experience the essence of anything, one has experienced
the essence of all things, since the essence at the very heart of
any thing is existence itself, Being. Thus the philosophers who
seek to know the essence of their subjects or sciences, though they
may each look in different directions, will all reach the same conclusion,
arrive at the same point of understanding. The many sciences are
different aspects of one essence which is the search for knowledge,
and the essence of knowledge is pure comprehension.
So the philosopher who seeks wisdom should aim to experience the
Essence. Knowing the Essence, all aspects are understood.
The pilgrim soul and the ascetic holy man seek union with God.
But the philosopher, although he may at times walk with the crowd
and though he may often sit alone in quiet meditation, knows that
union with God is unattainable. He knows that God is Unity itself
and there never were any outside God.
In his travels - his wandering, his studies and his searching -
he seeks only to end the ignorance which clouds his vision and prevents
him from realising the Truth. Clear is the glass whether clean or
unclean: divine unity is always, it is just that false notions of
separateness delude the mind. When the accumulated grime of ages
is wiped away, the glass is seen to have been transparent all along.
By the steady process of elimination, the searching philosopher
rids his mind of error and deceit until all that is left is naked
Truth. There is only God. God is.
Philosophers, seek Truth rather than answers to questions. Answers
may be right or wrong. Truth is Truth. One may find the right answers
and still not know Truth. Seek Truth - knowing Truth, no questions
arise and no answers are needed.
Truth is. There is nothing other than Truth. Even when a lie is
told, Truth is present. But this Truth is not something you can
put your finger on, it is neither revealed nor concealed. It is
imperceptibly always. Your finger is always on it.
But, philosophers, as long as we seek Truth it will ever elude
us. We may see the leaf-laden branches of the silver birch blowing,
but will never catch sight of the wind. We may hear the faded echo
of our own voice, but will never find the distant caller.
So seek Truth, philosophers, as far as you can. But know that the
Truth you seek cannot be found; if it could it would not be the
ever-present, eternal, whole Truth. Where is Truth? Has it not been
with you always?
All things are founded on Truth, and Truth pervades all things.
Yet inasmuch as things express this all-pervading Truth they are
inevitably faulty, imperfect. Hence no statement can be irrelatively
True; Truth cannot be presented without contradiction, it being
always present.
So all statements are erroneous as far as real Truth is concerned.
But although all statements are unsound, some are closer to Truth
than others. In the world of opposites and relatives we have relative
truths and falsehoods. Truth pervades all things is
a relative truth, not absolutely true but an apt enough expression.
Of course, all this that I have said is unavoidably flawed; unavoidably,
that is, if I am to pronounce at all. There is no closer to
Truth if Truth is everywhere present. There can be nothing
other than Truth, notwithstanding conceptual whims. Relativity is
erroneous, falsehood untrue.
No serious discourse can touch laughter. Laugh, laugh, laugh. Situations
permitting, of course.
The philosopher should neither laugh too loud nor too quiet, and
should laugh when laughter arises comfortably with the least of
effort. And although he may find the words and actions of others
simply silly or preposterously pompous, above all he must be able
to laugh at himself, at his own fickle foibles and fancies.
If one cannot laugh, all ones seriousness is not worth a
jot!
It is good and virtuous to do what is right; dishonourable and
unjust to perpetrate a wrong. But on some occasions it is good and
right to do what would be otherwise wrong, and wrong to do what
is otherwise right.
This does not mean that right and wrong are capricious fancies.
Quite the opposite, since the bare Ideas right and wrong remain
constant. It is only their outer forms and appearances and applications
that change relative to the situation.
The high Idea of the Right holds fast throughout. The same cannot
be said of the Idea of the wrong, since whereas the Right is the
Real and thus self-sufficient, the wrong is assumed to be something
other than the Real and therefore dependent. Of course, the wrong
is error, the Right is Truth.
Never submit and succumb to the beguiled rule of ignorance. In
the fight for freedom and truth, never give in. You cannot. For
until you have overcome all ignorance and situated yourself in the
Seat of Truth, there will be no rest. You must overcome. You cannot
lose.
Any submission to ignorance is only temporary, as truth must eventually
prevail. All difficulties must be overcome, they are impediments
to progression. And all impediments to progression must fall. The
pull of destiny is against them.
But never give in to the errors of enmity and opposition, philosophers,
for if you have enemies enmity exists in yourself, and division
is contrary to Truth. Never requite wrong with wrong, nor think
that you can quash ignorance with error.
Always seek freedom and truth, for yourself and for the whole,
whatever difficulties stand in your way. And tackle all obstacles
without anger or impatience - these being obstacles themselves -
in the knowledge that goodness will prevail and Truth stands eternally
without flaw. Never give in and settle for anything less than Truth.
Surrender only to Truth, philosophers. And surrender to it you
must. For who or what is greater than Truth?
In your fight for freedom and truth you must seek to overcome all
ignorance. But be prepared to surrender your arms when Truth beckons.
Do not lose sight of the goal and in your fighting forget peace.
True peace was never won without the laying down of arms. Likewise
Truth will not be realised without the letting go of error.
Truth makes no demands for surrender. Yet all who have ever opposed
it in their ignorance will in time see the folly of error and surrender
their souls willingly to the just rule of Truth. The Kingdom of
Truth is ever open to those who have surrendered their arms of opposition
outside the gate. Only those souls who persist in the ways of ignorance
will find no entry, for the ignorant soul is his own enemy.
So lay down your errors, your transient notions and worldly beliefs,
your thoughts of possession and your longing for freedom. Let fall
the man-made walls and the barbed fences that fiercely define who
you are and who you are not. Truth has no limits, no distinct doctrine,
and Freedom can never be realised without letting go.
One who renounces desires actually merges in the world and
expands his love to the whole universe, said Ramana Maharshi.
While one should not abandon the world, mental desires and attachments
are a hindrance to the realisation of Truth and the philosopher
would do well to renounce them.
The philosopher need not spurn what the strict ascetic might call
the mortal shackles of the material world and live a
penurious and isolated life doting on his soul, but neither should
he crave unnecessaries which only distract him from his goal. It
is quite acceptable for the philosopher to have some material comfort
if this allows him to pursue his art and settle his awareness in
Truth more readily.
True renunciation is not of the objects of desire but of desire
itself and its henchman, attachment. The philosopher, however, should
have learned by now that bodily desires serve only to please the
body and that the striving of the soul is for a higher purpose.
And in discovering this he is already putting the needs of the soul
above those of the body; for the body is not much concerned with
the whys and the wherefores of its existence, until in it the pull
of the soul begins to stir.
Eventually, though, the striving of the soul, which disciplines
and guides the body towards the true good, must achieve its aim
of total renunciation and drop the imagined boundaries that have
prevented mergence with the world. Whether the body is alive or
dead, active in the world or in spiritual retreat, makes no difference
to such a one. He is as he is.
The philosopher should not abandon the world. Whether he lives
alone or with a close-knit community, the world is with him. And
although he may view the world of the senses as imperfect and impure
and may regularly turn his mind inward in search of perfection,
his aim must be to embrace the world wholly and without vexation.
Moreover, since the perfection which he seeks is ever untainted
and untouchable - as Unity endures seeming separates - and is at
the heart of his being, and the world, it should cause him no great
concern whatever the circumstances. He should tread the path fate
lays for him with steady resolution and cheerful acceptance, all
the while attentive to unflinching Truth.
It makes no difference to Truth whether a lie is told or not. Therefore
the soul of the philosopher need not shun the mundane, but should
see the spark of Beauty and Truth reflected in all things of the
world, in all parts of the whole. His own body he should seek to
raise up closer to the Light and his own senses sharpen, and he
should take his place in the evolution of the material world which
is always progressing, always moving on.
In raising his human-self out of ignorance and towards the perfect
he is completing his allotted task, fulfilling his assigned contribution
to the betterment of the world. What is truly beneficial to the
individual is also beneficial to the whole.
All is alive; it is just that some things appear less alive than
others. There is only life. What we term lifeless or
dead is a state at the far end of lifes spectrum
that is nevertheless a part of life, partaking, albeit in a diminished
degree, of the essence Life.
In the world of opposites life expresses its reflection, death
- though only superficially since death is played upon the stage
of life and is made of the stuff of life and existence. Even when
a form is void of independent animation, the spirit of the world
is in it.
Life is the reality and truly has no opposite with which to be
contrasted. Nothing exists which is not in life and has not life
in it. And though it seems there is a hierarchy ranging from the
most alive to the least, this is illusion, since there is no place
where life is anywhere lacking. Lifelessness is both in life an
illusory affectation and in the mind a false concept. Like non-existence,
it is the means of distinguishing what is otherwise an undistinguished
reality.
The philosopher is a translator, he understands the language of
the cosmos and translates her subtle speech into the words of man.
The majority of mankind cannot comprehend the parlance she speaks.
Some do not believe she speaks at all, they hear only gibberish
and meaningless noise.
But the philosopher looks for patterns in that noise, and through
patterns he deciphers meaning from what had previously appeared
meaningless or baffling. He makes sense of the seemingly senseless.
He listens and learns. He makes mistakes sometimes, but that is
part of the course.
The role of the philosopher is to teach man what is being taught
him already, to convey to man what is already being conveyed but
which he does not hear. The philosopher speaks to man in his own
language, the language he is more responsive to, communicating the
wisdom of the world.
The philosopher is a translator, but he is always eager to turn
the mind of man towards the original text from which he reads. Man
should not settle for translations, but should learn the language
of the cosmos himself, so that he may know firsthand and fully comprehend
the essential meaning of the worlds tremulous song.
There are several ways of interpreting and understanding religious
writings. For example, the Old Testament of the Bible tells of how
Jonah, having been cast into the sea, was swallowed up by a great
fish, wherein he remained three days and three nights before being
jettisoned safe upon the shore.
To some who follow a particular faith this is exactly how it was.
To others it is pure fantasy and a blatant falsehood. Others might
see it as a storytellers exaggeration of an actual event.
Some may see it simply as an allegorical tale of Jonahs doom
and salvation. And some may read in it a symbolic description of
an esoteric event, Jonahs death and rebirth.
The trick is discerning which of the above five options applies
when reading a particular passage in religious texts. Certainly,
not one of them applies all of the time. The scriptures, passed
down through the years, are, like myths, a mixture of truth, falsehood,
exaggeration, allegory and esoteric symbolism. Therefore the student
of religious texts, and for that matter mythological accounts, should
be aware of these possibilities and treat any interpretation judiciously.
There is only the Real. Nothing can be outside the Real, since
what is not real does not exist. Therefore the Real is all-inclusive.
The Real is Truth. The Real is One. Yet the greatness implied in
the term the Real can only stand in contradistinction
to the fallibility of that which is not real. But the unreal
does not exist, so as a concept it is erroneous.
Concepts may be right or wrong, accurate or unfounded, but are
always faulty. Their error lies in their not being all-inclusive,
since a concept stands out in the mind distinct from what it is
not. The Real, on the other hand, is a complete whole which allows
no other or opposite, but in conceptualising and expressing it we
must needs contradistinguish and inevitably contradict it.
The Real, then, cannot be conclusively known, for as long as there
exists the notion of a distinct knower the marring blemish of error
is still present. The Real can only be perceived when
all errors are abandoned. This is the goal of the philosopher.
© David A. Hall 1998
|